Post by arfankj4 on Mar 4, 2024 22:13:37 GMT -7
“WE RELY ON PHYSICIANS PENMANSHIP IN MAKING SOME PRETTY IMPORTANT DECISIONS” But there was one important caveat Increasing both EHR use and delegation gave large practices with four or more clinicians a productivity boost while the same dual increase led to a productivity loss among small practices with high levels of delegation. Bigger practices may benefit more from EHRs by allowing a larger group to communicate more effectively Huckman hypothesizes.
In smaller practices where informal but highly effective relationships may exist introducing an EHR system might generate formal processes that at a certain level become counterproductive. In Poland Mobile Number List large practices where staff might be less likely to interact face to face putting such a system in place might serve to make communication richer and bring people closer. But in a small practice where face to face contact is more common and effective introducing an EHR might make communication more sterile leading to either a smaller gain—or even decline—in productivity.
There may be other explanations for the differences among practice sizes. For example large practices may devote more time to training and workflow protocols that improve productivity. should not dissuade practices large or small from using EHRs Huckman says. Electronic records have many benefits. In particular patient data can be shared relatively easily between providers within a given practice and some of the errors that result from illegible penmanship might be avoided. We rely on physicians penmanship in making some pretty important decisions Huckman says. That has been a challenge at times. We could still get it wrong with an electronic health record but the chances are lower. And mistakes can be detected much more quickly.
In smaller practices where informal but highly effective relationships may exist introducing an EHR system might generate formal processes that at a certain level become counterproductive. In Poland Mobile Number List large practices where staff might be less likely to interact face to face putting such a system in place might serve to make communication richer and bring people closer. But in a small practice where face to face contact is more common and effective introducing an EHR might make communication more sterile leading to either a smaller gain—or even decline—in productivity.
There may be other explanations for the differences among practice sizes. For example large practices may devote more time to training and workflow protocols that improve productivity. should not dissuade practices large or small from using EHRs Huckman says. Electronic records have many benefits. In particular patient data can be shared relatively easily between providers within a given practice and some of the errors that result from illegible penmanship might be avoided. We rely on physicians penmanship in making some pretty important decisions Huckman says. That has been a challenge at times. We could still get it wrong with an electronic health record but the chances are lower. And mistakes can be detected much more quickly.
